Saturday, August 5, 2023

Southern Pacific Lines B-50-28/-29 Postwar AAR Box Cars (including St. Louis Southwestern)

 

This is a particularly interesting photo with no less than three of the B-50-28/-29 box cars visible: T&NO 61062 (left center), SP 102260 (behind and left) and unknown SP/T&NO behind the PRR X43B at center. The SP Lines car to the left of SP 102260 is a sibling B-50-27 class box car. Columbus, GA, ca. 1958, image CG-2590, Central of Georgia Railway Historical Society, courtesy of Allen Tuten

Like many of you, I am eagerly awaiting my order from Tangent for these exciting new box cars. I ordered a couple of undecorated kits. As soon as I receive them, I will provide a follow on post with my thoughts about what's in the box, as well as how it compares to the old Sunshine kits, which were not without their errors. In future, I will post a third part after building a couple of the cars, but that will be a few months away. As a prelude, I present some data about the B-50-28 and -29 classes.

In 1950-1951, the Southern Pacific and Texas & New Orleans received a total of 3,000 and 1,500 class B-50-28 box cars, respectively, from Pullman-Standard. At the same time, SP-affiliated line St. Louis Southwestern (the Cotton Belt) received 100 identical box cars. In 1951, the SP also built 500 identical box cars in the Sacramento shops that were assigned to class B-50-29 (SP only.) The accompanying tables provide the details about all cars.

SSW 33938 was one of the 100 clones of the B-50-28 received by the Cotton Belt from Pullman-Standard in 1951. Note the "short" panel at the top and the wider panel (third from top) on the Superior door. Fayetteville, NC, October 12, 1952, Col. Chet McCoid photo, Bob's Photo

The cars continued the large scale program by the SP Lines to bolster its box car fleet in the postwar period. There is a direct line from the B-50-24, -25, -26 and -27 classes to the -28 and -29. Given the period of the cars' construction, there were evolutionary changes along the way.

At delivery, Texas & New Orleans B-50-28 no. 60049 included the '&' in the reporting marks and "SOUTHERN PACIFIC" spelled out above the reporting marks. Illinois Digital Archives, Pullman History site

This group of cars followed the AAR design standards of the era, including recently introduced underframe where the crossbearers were shaped to pass below the four floor stringers (previous versions of the underframe had straight crossbearers and the stringers terminated on both sides of the crossbearers.) In SP fashion, the box cars maintained the inside height of 10'0", six inches less than the 10'6" that most other roads had standardized on by that time. Instead of having ten evenly sized panels on the sides, these SP cars had eight evenly spaced panels with two narrower ones on either side of the door openings. The Improved Dreadnaught ends were as noted in the photo caption below. Murphy diagonal panel roofs were standard on all of the cars in these classes. Hand brakes and running boards varied as noted in the accompanying tables. Interestingly (for the SP,) all 5,000 of the B-50-28 and -29 were equipped with ASF A-3 Ride Control trucks.

Build data is tabulated below. All Lot numbers are Pullman-Standard, except where noted as SPE, which indicates built by Southern Pacific. For the Cotton Belt cars (nos. 33850-33949), all 100 used Superior doors, Universal hand brakes and Morton running boards and brake steps.

Reporting MarksSeriesQty.LotClass
SP102100-10359915005967B-50-28
SP103600-104099500SPEB-50-29
SP104100-10509910005982B-50-28
SP105100-1055995008001B-50-28
T&NO59750-602495005967B-50-28
T&NO60250-6124910008001B-50-28

The B-50-28 employed an Improved Dreadnaught end with a couple distinctive traits: the narrow rectangular stiffening rib at the top of the end and the "flat" horizontal bottom of the main top rib on the end. Illinois Digital Archives, Pullman History site

The specialties applied to the B-50-28 and -29 are as follows:


Reporting MarksSeriesHand BrakeR/B & B/SDoors
SP102100MinerApex Tri-LokSuperior
SP102101-102599MinerApex Tri-LokYoungstown
SP102600-103099ChampionApex Tri-LokYoungstown
SP103100-103599EquipcoMortonYoungstown
SP103600-104099AjaxApex Tri-LokYoungstown
SP104100-104224MinerUS GypsumYoungstown
SP104225-104599MinerApex Tri-LokYoungstown
SP104600-104849ChampionApex Tri-LokYoungstown
SP104850-105099EquipcoApex Tri-LokSuperior
SP105100-105299MinerMortonSuperior
SP105300-105549ChampionMortonSuperior
SP105550-105599UniversalMortonSuperior
T&NO59750MinerApex Tri-LokYoungstown
T&NO59751-60249MinerMortonSuperior
T&NO60250-60374UniversalMortonYoungstown
T&NO60375-60449UniversalUS GypsumYoungstown
T&NO60450-60749EquipcoUS GypsumYoungstown
T&NO60750-61149MinerKerriganYoungstown
T&NO61150-61249SuperiorKerriganYoungstown
 

SP 105054 employed an Equipco power hand brake and Apex Tri-Lok running boards and brake step. Illinois Digital Archives, Pullman History site

T&NO 60299 was equipped with a Universal power hand brake and Morton running boards and brake step. Illinois Digital Archives, Pullman History site

T&NO 59951 was repainted eight years after delivery in an entirely different scheme, with large "SOUTHERN PACIFIC" name and no SP medallion. Note that the placard board was moved to a lower location on the door. Fayetteville, NC, Nov. 27, 1959, Col. Chet McCoid photo, Bob's Photo


When repainted, Cotton Belt cars received a stencil at the upper left of the end that identified paint, location, and date, as shown here

References:

  • Ed Hawkins, "10'0" IH Postwar 40'6" A.A.R. Box Cars," Railway Prototype Cyclopedia 8
  • Anthony Thompson, Southern Pacific Freight Cars Volume 4: Box Cars (revised edition) 

IF YOU SEE ANY ERRORS IN THE DATA PRESENTED HEREIN, THEY ARE SOLELY MINE AND I WOULD REQUEST THAT YOU KINDLY LET ME KNOW IN THE COMMENTS SECTION BELOW! Thank you

6 comments:

  1. Curious to know what is the load in the GA gon? Is that a tarped sand- like load where the tarp has failed?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Curious about the load in the GA gon, what is it and what has happened to tarp?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I confess that I never even noticed that! We all see the same thing differently. I am uncertain what happened, but it predates the widespread use of plastics and canvas wouldn't have been that weak, I think. Maybe thick paper that became wet?

      Delete
    2. looks like maybe used tar paper or animal hide? but the top piece would be a very large cow. could be paper of some kind as many pulp/paper mills were in Georgia.

      Delete
  3. I've been having difficulty sourcing 400 and 600 grit aluminum oxide. Could you share your source?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I sourced from here: https://sandblastingabrasives.com/aluminum-oxides-3/white-fused-alum-oxides-5.html

      Delete

Comments always welcome!